Saturday 25th of January 2020 06:05:09 AM GMT

Oakland Raiders Latest Legal Defense Of City Of Oakland Lawsuit Has Major Flaw

Oakland Raiders Latest Legal Defense Of City Of Oakland Lawsuit Has Major FlawOakland Raiders Latest Legal Defense Of City Of Oakland Lawsuit Has Major Flaw

Insight Terminal Solutions

Better Mind CBD

(Last Updated On: November 27, 2019)

Oakland Raiders Latest Legal Defense Of City Of Oakland Lawsuit Has Major Flaw

ONN – Oakland Raiders Latest Legal Defense Of City Of Oakland Lawsuit Has Major Flaw

The Oakland Raiders response to the City of Oakland’s response to the Silver and Black and NFL’s motion to dismiss the City’s lawsuit over the Las Vegas Relocation includes a major flaw of reasoning and fact. The only reason this vlogger can think of that it’s there is to take advantage of Federal Chief Magestrate Judge Joseph Spero’s lack of knoweldge of the details and common practices around NFL stadium negotiations.

Bascially, the Oakland Raiders response (or “Oakland Raiders Response”) was written as if the City of Oakland had paid $100’s of millions in tax payer money to the Raiders and the NFL up front, before an agreement was struck. It’s a completely ass-backward presentation that’s can only be there due to some effort on the part of the Raiders to fool the judge.

This is what the Oakland Raiders Response reads:

Oakland contends that the purportedly limited number of NFL clubs affords the clubs market power and allows them to overcharge the Host Cities with which they negotiate. FAC 64. Whatever else might be said about this purported overcharge, Oakland did not pay it. Antitrust standing to complain of overcharges is limited to purchasers of the overcharged item; non-purchasers (even those allegedly priced out of the market) do not have standing. Oakland’s other alleged injuries—lost municipal investments, lost tax revenues, lost rent, and devaluation of the Coliseum property—are legally insufficient to confer standing. As this Court previously recognized, these harms are too indirect, too speculative, and/or not harms to a commercial interest.

Ok, let’s rip this up, er, take this in stages:

Oakland Raiders Response: Oakland contends that the purportedly limited number of NFL clubs affords the clubs market power and allows them to overcharge the Host Cities with which they negotiate.
FACT: Oakland Raiders Owner Mark Davis together with his then-business partner Las Vegas Sands Founder and CEO Sheldon Adelson, managed to get the Nevada Legislature to meet the $750 million subsidy ask that Davis and Adelson publicly said they needed for Las Vegas Stadium or they would walk away from the negotiating table with the State of Nevada and Clark County.
FACT: The $750 million subsidy came to define the difference between the stadium proposals presented by the City of Oakland with the County of Alameda and the State of Nevada and Clark County: Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf had said more than once that she would not get into a bidding war with Las Vegas.
FACT: Toward the last days of the back-and-forth of review and response of City of Oakland / Alameda County plans, Fortress Investments Drew McNight had said to this vlogger that then NFL Business Affairs Executive Vice President and new stadium / LA team relocation point man Eric Grubman told him Davis wanted a kind of “Las Vegas-style” loan structure of $750 million. In other words, Davis reportedly wanted an Oakland deal that was as close to the mirror image of the State of Nevada and Clark County $750 million special hotel tax subsidy as possible. The request took Fortress’ McNight by surprise because it would require a wholesale scrapping of the development-driven revenue-sharing plan they had for the Raiders and the National Football League.

With those facts, you can see just how weak the Oakland Raiders Legal Defense is. Stay tuned for more analysis of that crappy Oakland Raiders Response To Lawsuit file.

Note from Oakland News Now Technical: this video-blog post shows the full and live operation of the latest updated version of an experimental Zennie62Media mobile media video-blogging system network that was launched June 2018. This is a major part of Zennie62Media’s new and innovative approach to the production of news media. The uploaded video is from a vlogger with the Zennie62 on YouTube Partner Channel, then uploaded to and formatted automatically at the Oakland News Now site and Zennie62-owned social media pages. The overall objective is smartphone-enabled, real-time, on the scene reporting of news, interviews, observations, and happenings anywhere in the World and within seconds and not hours. Now, news is reported with a smartphone: no heavy and expensive cameras or even a laptop are necessary. The secondary objective is faster, and very inexpensive media production and distribution. We have found there is a disconnect between post length and time to product and revenue generated. With this, the problem is far less, though by no means solved. Zennie62Media is constantly working to improve the system network coding and seeks interested content and media technology partners.

via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/41Wkne9a-NM

About the Author

Zennie Abraham
Zennie Abraham is the CEO of Zennie62Media
;

Oakland News Now Recent Blog Posts